WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Shocked by a "catastrophe'' that is wiping out frog
populations worldwide, a government committee met Wednesday to discuss
what to do about it -- and whether humans are also in danger.
``All amphibian biologists are now convinced that something unusual and
catastrophic is happening to amphibians,'' Ron Heyer of the Smithsonian
Institution told reporters.
This consensus was needed before the government could really act, he said.
It has decided to work fast.
The committee, commissioned by the Interior Department, includes officials
from the Environmental Protection Agency, the Health and Human Services
Department, the National Institutes of Health, other agencies and
environmental groups.
Bill Brown, scientific adviser to Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, said
President Clinton proposed adding $8.1 million next year to the Interior
Department's budget for studying amphibian decline -- a huge increase in
the $1 million now allocated.
Although the United States has lost just one amphibian species to
extinction -- the Las Vegas frog -- entire species have been wiped out in
Costa Rica and Australia. And whole populations have disappeared in the
United States, Puerto Rico and central America.
Heyer said possible factors include ultraviolet radiation allowed through
by the thinning ozone layer, climate change, and chemicals called endocrine
disruptors because they mimic the effects of hormones on the body.
Such chemicals can cause deformities and interfere with reproduction.
``We also think the amphibians are telling us humans something has happened
to the habitat we share with the frogs,'' Heyer said. ``We need to act on
the early warning the amphibians are giving.''
The decline in the United States first hit headlines when schoolchildren in
Minnesota started bringing home horribly deformed frogs. But when
scientists started looking, they found frogs were disappearing.
``In some sites we are actually witnessing the decline as we try to study
it,'' said Gary Fellers, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological
Survey.
He said one California species, the mountain yellow-legged frog, is a good
example. ``Over a 10- or 12-year period this frog has rapidly declined,''
he said.
``Even at sites where we do find frogs, we find four or six or eight
individuals.'' There used to be hundreds.
There are a number of possible causes, said Fellers, who stressed that
scientists are just starting to sort them out.
``The most significant, we believe, is airborne contaminants -- pesticides
and herbicides that are used in huge quantities in central California,'' he
said.
Prevailing winds blow the chemicals into the Sierra Nevada mountains. Those
areas that get the most winds from the agricultural valleys have the fewest
frogs, Fellers said.
``We have not yet demonstrated that the contaminants have caused the
decline. But ... those areas with the most contaminants are the areas with
the fewest frogs,'' he said.
Other possible causes are the introduction of fish into lakes where they do
not naturally occur. ``They eat frogs and they eat tadpoles,'' Fellers
said. It is also possible that disease is playing a role, he said.
Other scientists have identified a fungus that kills some frogs.
The researchers are reluctant to blame any specific chemicals. Not only has
cause and effect not been proved, but many different chemicals are
involved.
Sam Droegge, also a research biologist at the USGS, said citizens can help
``They can actually help us in terms of collecting data,'' he said.
The Interior Department, an environmental group and a children's television
have set up an Internet site -- http://www.frogweb.gov
-- to commission schoolchildren as a nationwide ``frog force.'' The site asks
U.S. and Canadian residents to report sightings of normal and malformed amphibians
encountered during outdoor activities.
We learned of this from: www.cseti.org
http://www.execpc.com/~kubos/
Email address is:
kubos@execpc.com
Ken Kubos, Ph.D.
Neural Networks, Inc.